High end aeg brands

Which Company make the best aeg's and why?

All joking aside.........


ICS makes excellent guns, and only buy G&P if you know your way around a gearbox.

Booligan wrote:

Systema. They are the best AEGs you can buy, period. Sure they are $1200-$1500, but they are great nonetheless

I forgot to say Systema Doesn't count, they're a given. Try again.

Senor Awsome, What is so great about ICS?

ICS has what many say is an hop up which rivals Tokyo Mauri's, and a higher fps + rof.

Thats what i wanted to hear

Booligan wrote:

You should have clarified that before hand

I assumed you wouldn't take a cheap shot like that.

yeah, no one just plays airsoft with Systema

I voted ICS. ICS and G&G are the best, and I think ICS might be a little better. (It has a lot of cool features)

Topic moved.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

ICS the best lol, last time I checked ICS was no where near VFC.

This is based solely on one's opinion. One person may think your way omd, others may not. Personally i like ICS. This is because they have nice trades on their m4s, split gearbox so its easy to work with, and good internals.

omd there is no wrong or right answer its just his opinion...
I personally dont have a favorite brand cause i never shot one b4 and most are so similar and alike. If i were to have to go with one i would go with CA. They are a good brand and are a reliable company.

^^ I was just stating the general opinions of the airsoft community.

Not my own.

o ok.. can you give the link to these general opinions in the airsoft community? it may help..

I can only vote for ICS or CA, since I feel I should really only vote for a brand of a gun I've used.

I liked ICS, for I have played a few matches with a friends AK74, as seen here on airsplat: http://www.airsplat.com/Items/ER-ICS-25-AK47.htm

A very nice gun, I'll admit. The rate of fire is high, and the distance it reaches is very decent, and accurate. Add on 2 600 round hicaps, makes for one sick gun.

My experiences with CA are generally the same, though I actually own this one, so I can relate to the gun better. Some people like CA, some don't hey it's your opinion. I personally like the M15A4 carbine, the gun that I own. There may be a few better options out there now on the market, but nonetheless, I am not disappointed. It's been through a lot, and still runs just like when I got it. (sans the hopup, that's just trash).

I can say I liked the feel of the ICS better. I'm actually not a big fan of the AK74 huge style, I'm starting to like the more compact, wooden foregrip style, like the one Echo 1 came out with, or a VFC, though I can't imagine paying so much for a gun. EDIT: Just saw your previous posts on VFC. This post is not in conjunction with those ideas stated earlier, just a coincidence both posts mentioned the brand.

But forgetting that, ICS vs CA, not until recently have I really made up my mind but I'd go ICS. Saying that it's the best brand out there.... how should I know. I don't think there is really a "best brand" or a "best gun", because there's a lot of other mumbo jumbo that makes up the determining factors in a decision. That's not why I pick best, because usually I'll look for one type of gun in one brand, and maybe one in another.

So I'll keep it simple. Overall, I like what ICS has to offer over what CA has to offer.

What about the accuracy and field performance of the guns?

I never personally got to do my video comparison that I wanted to do earlier in the year, since we've only played airsoft one time since then. So I am sorry if my answer seems a bit vague, but it's from not having used the gun... for a while.

The AK and the M4 shot about the same distance, not sure about the total, but I'd say the M4 shot a tad bit better, but that's expected, as it's upgraded. The accuracy on the AK was also better than the M4, which I would attribute to the malfunctioning hopup unit, not any other problem.

The rate of fire on the AK was also higher, but again, I'm comparing it to a gearbox with an M120, but even still I'd expect it to be a tad higher.

Both perform very well, I'd say out of the box, the ICS would be shooting just a tad better.

Voted other, KWA. Great external features along with internal.

Does the Li-Po battery effect the KWA's fps, rof or any thing else; does this contribute to its overall performance?

All it affects is ROF and power of spring able to be pulled.
* Not 100% sure on the spring *

^^ It just gives the motor more power to fully compress the spring.
You would really only need a 11.1v battery for pulling an extremely powerful spring, so don't buy one if you have like an M120, or M130,. It would be an unnecessary waste of money.

So if you were to buy a regular 8.4v battery the KWA would have less fps?

^^ Like Booligan said Tommyboy.

Know this, an 7.2v battery should be able to give the motor enough power to pull an M100(Systema version, 360FPS avg.) easily.

If not, your gun is not properly shimmed. Same goes for an 8.4v with an M120. You should be able to use an 8.4v with an M120 and be fine, but you would want to get a 9.6v so you get a more impressive ROF that you would with an 8.4v.

im torn between TM and G&G
TM because they have some of the most reliable gearboxes i have seen (AUG,G36), they have excellent upgrade potential (except the FAMAS), and all the TMs i have shot have had awesome accuracy.
G&G because of they ahve superior metal bodies to almost any brand, have great stock fps and accuracy, and have great internal (seems only recently they have finally came out with very reliable internals though)

Im surprised nobody had even said TM

Systema is the Best, I have a Systema M4A1 PTW MAX full auto and burst, it changes FPS thru cylinders and is very accurate and confortable, expensive though