New: G36-C-Echo 1 vs. Classic Army Comparison

Part one:



Part two:



Part three:

Nice! is that a Classic Army Sportline or Proline

CA doesnt make a sportline G36c. And if you were paying attention you would know hes had it for 6 months. The sportline have not been out that long.

Nice videos! These will get airsoft reports more well known. After seeing that, I think I would honestly go with the Echo1. The things the CA have over the Echo1 is not enough for me to spend the extra money. Great videos KONRAD!

Sorry, couldnt watch that long, watched most of it though, it looks great though, (part one does)

I thought the CA would have been superior to the Echo 1. The CA's rate of fire was a little disappointing also. I would definitely go for an Echo 1.

Yeah, if you put a tightbore barrel in and some other stuff, it would still be a lot cheaper than a CA and it will perform much better

CA has had a drop for a while, I will go for the echo, and have some minor tuneup for low costs, or a TM G36, and upgrade the spring

Not too much a fan of the G36 line, but if I had to get one it'd be the CA G36c. Call me a fanboy, but I like what you get when you buy a CA gun.

Nice review. Pretty much sums up that the money that you pay for isin't so much firepower, it's the internal and external qualities that rise.

good point, but I think the ECHO1 is a better choice, so you can save money, and buy a better gun, that is not a CA, but better (I think the TM is better then the CA) also you can upgrade it so it is better than the CA with the leftover money you have from not buying the CA

fdsakiller wrote:

good point, but I think the ECHO1 is a better choice, so you can save money, and buy a better gun, that is not a CA, but better (I think the TM is better then the CA) also you can upgrade it so it is better than the CA with the leftover money you have from not buying the CA

Yes TM is much better.

it may be less powerful, but it will last longer and will most likely be more accurate due to their famous hop up

but put in a new spring, if you put in the right spring, it will not effect the life of the gun, what sometimes really messes up the life of the gun, is endless spraying (like for more than 15 seconds)

I agree, TM will perform a lot better. Imagine a TM with a tightbore and a new spring.

well, TM G36 isnt that expensive, I might get it, but I dont know if I have a use for it

I feel that what Konrad said at the end was great, "There is no right answer. . . Get the gun you like the look of, its your money. . . If you like the way it looks and your getting a reputable brand, don't worry about anything else." I feel this is very true.

true, but I think a lot of people like the full metal body

RoboFURY wrote:

I feel that what Konrad said at the end was great, "There is no right answer. . . Get the gun you like the look of, its your money. . . If you like the way it looks and your getting a reputable brand, don't worry about anything else." I feel this is very true.

yes, that is true. It is pretty much what the guy at my walk in store told me when I was picking out my Echo 1.

Which E1 do you have, also I think the E1 is better for people, who dont like heavy weight guns

I have the MP5 A4.

Nice

i thought he moved so why is the back ground the same

fdsakiller wrote:

true, but I think a lot of people like the full metal body

The CA36 series dosn't have a metal body.

Captain Crunch wrote:

fdsakiller wrote:

true, but I think a lot of people like the full metal body

The CA36 series dosn't have a metal body.

I thought they used to have metal bodies?

I remember reading like 2 years ago that the G36 series have full metal bodies.

No, I beleive their bodies are fiber-glass, because that's what the real G36 uses.

the real one I have heard is still very heavy, well not as heavy as a bigger firearm, but still heavy