CA AUG or TM AUG

Heya Guys,
I was wondering what you guys think about these two guns. They seem to me that they are pratically identical. I heard from a friend that the CA has had some problems with jamming or something so he reccomended the TM. Also, the TM costs a lot less. What is your opinion??
TM: http://poweredgeusa.com/product.asp?CategoryID=66&ID=2639
CA: http://www.airsoftgi.com/product_info.php?cPath=139_24_91&products_id=1908

THANKS!!!

Do you want a metal body or do you want reliable internals?

mp5a5ris wrote:

my friend has the CA aug. he too has a lot of problems with jamming. also, the foregrip breaks off early

The foregrip is weak on every AUG airsoft gun.

So how does he work his AUG? Becuause I would thing that it would be hard to use that gun without the front foregrip and there is no RIS system to attach another one on to.

Well in the case of that happening you can always buy an aud ohantim kit, im pretty sure it has ris. Personally i prefer the looks of the Aug A3, but no one makes one as of now...

Actually, i did see one, but it was over 600$ which is way out of my price range. Oh, and overmedicated, you mentioned that the TM has better internals but what is the TM made out of?? Is his the ALS or ALR or something plastic??? Oh, and what would be a good scope to put on it because it has the built in scope RIS system. I want something fairly cheap too. Any suggestions??

Yes, TMs have plastic bodies.

Ok, do you have any suggestions on scopes that would be good and fairly cheap??

For the TM or CA I would go with the TM
the Classic Army is more expensive and has a metal body
the TM is less expensive but with plastic body
the difference is that the TM interior is much better and is top of the line quality
It jams less
change the motor because it is 280fps because of japanese speed law

The motor has nothing to do with the FPS. Spring, and air seal is FPS, motor is ROF.

you are right but in some cases in larger rifles it does ( gas powered rifles sometimes)