Comparison Of m16's

What you guys think of the G&G GR16 A3 compared to the ICS M16

EDIT YOUR SUBJECT TITLE TO THE APPROPRIATE TEXT.
-OmD

I rly hate both of them, just hate m16 in general its a poor excuse for a gun in reel steel compared to the ak 47, 74.

Um who cares?

SO far I would prefer the ICS only becasue I haven't seen or held the G&G yet. The ICS has a reseting button on the side of the receiver that either resets the gears or decompresses the spring(I forgot which one). But One reason I'm not to crazy about the ICS is the shiny hand guards(IMO) and they aren't as stiff as teh CA m16 hand guard.

3T wrote:

I rly hate both of them, just hate m16 in general its a poor excuse for a gun in reel steel compared to the ak 47, 74.

Not really

AK-47s are very powerful, but not very accurate. They also have quite a bit of recoil. Really the only thing that the AK has going for it is it's power, it's cheap, and it is indestructible. If the AK is so amazing, why does the Army still use the M4?

Back OT

I'd go G&G, better internals.

well I would go for the G&G for better internals,
the army uses M16s and M4s for accuracy, and low recoil, it doesnt really matter in Iraq since most of them dont have body armor, this isnt Call of Duty 4

I have bought the G&G, and speaking of call of duty 4 ( I know this is really ot) if you have live and COD4 pm me

sure


(rest of post please go back on topic not COD4)